<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AskGsm- Mobile Phone News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.askgsm.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.askgsm.com</link>
	<description>AskGsm.com is all about mobile phones news and bringing you up to date info on latest phones and mobile gadgets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:12:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sprint admits it overstated initial HTC EVO 4G sales</title>
		<link>http://www.askgsm.com/htc/Sprint-admits-it-overstated-initial-HTC-EVO-4G-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askgsm.com/htc/Sprint-admits-it-overstated-initial-HTC-EVO-4G-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ev-do rev. a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overstated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S620]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speech recognition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgsm.com?p=11015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Available since last Friday (June 04), the HTC EVO 4G is by far the best smartphone Sprint has had, so it is not surprising that many customers want. Initially, Sprint announced that &#34;the total number of 4G EVO HTC devices sold on the day of release was three times the number of pre Samsung Instinct [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Available since last Friday (June 04), the HTC EVO 4G is by far the best smartphone Sprint has had, so it is not surprising that many customers want. </p>
<p> Initially, Sprint announced that &quot;the total number of 4G EVO HTC devices sold on the day of release was three times the number of pre Samsung Instinct and Palm devices sold during its first three days on the market combined.&quot; </p>
<p> However, estimates of the company were wrong. A press release has been updated on the website of Sprint, to correct the error. As a result, the launch of HTC 4G EVO sale days were actually &quot;six times higher than the day of the launch of Samsung Instinct and nearly double the sales on Palm Pre-launch.&quot; Sure, it still sold over Sprint EVO launch day, although the carrier is shy to provide exact sales figures &#8211; it is estimated that around 200,000 units were sold during the weekends. </p>
<p style=" text-align: center;" ><a href='http://www.askgsm.com/images/Sprint-admits-it-overstated-initial-HTC-EVO-G-sales_avris_0.jpg'><img src='http://www.askgsm.com/images/Sprint-admits-it-overstated-initial-HTC-EVO-G-sales_avris_0.jpg'  alt='Sprint admits it overstated initial HTC EVO 4G sales' style='float:right;padding:20px;max-width:px;max-height:590px;' border title="Sprint admits it overstated initial HTC EVO G sales avris 0" /></a></p>
<p> As the desire and HTC HTC Verizon Awesome Droid, the EVO 4G is quite difficult to find at the moment (it is sold online) &#8211; which means HTC and Sprint did not expect that demand for the handset to be as high. </p>
<p> The EVO 4G is currently offered by Sprint for only $ 199.99 on contract &#8211; a price that has become a standard for high-end smartphones in the U.S. (the Apple iPhone 16 GB 4 AT &amp; T will sell for $ 199.99, too).<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts:</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.askgsm.com/htc/Sprint-admits-it-overstated-initial-HTC-EVO-4G-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Acclaim r880 shows off its Android interface and QWERTY keyboard</title>
		<link>http://www.askgsm.com/android/Samsung-Acclaim-r880-shows-off-its-Android-interface-and-QWERTY-keyboard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askgsm.com/android/Samsung-Acclaim-r880-shows-off-its-Android-interface-and-QWERTY-keyboard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a-solar-panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a-video-promo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant voice translation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon von Tetzchner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[r88shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgsm.com?p=11014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When U.S. Cellular Samsung r880 Acclaim announced, nobody knew what the receiver would be well. A few weeks later, Google introduced the phone during their I / O conference, although without showing its QWERTY sliding keyboard. Fortunately, thanks to Samsung, we can now see the keyboard Acclaim &#8211; and is quite interesting, with four keys [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> When U.S. Cellular Samsung r880 Acclaim announced, nobody knew what the receiver would be well. A few weeks later, Google introduced the phone during their I / O conference, although without showing its QWERTY sliding keyboard. </p>
<p> Fortunately, thanks to Samsung, we can now see the keyboard Acclaim &#8211; and is quite interesting, with four keys on the left side painted in the color of the direction buttons, apparently for reasons related to gambling. </p>
<p> QWERTY keyboard also has the function of Acclaim Android 2.1, a 3.2 inch touchscreen HVGA, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Google services, 3MP camera and slot for memory expansion. As you can see, the phone is not totally like Samsung S Galaxy, but users of messaging-room on a budget should probably perfect. </p>
<p style=" text-align: center;" ><a href='http://www.askgsm.com/images/Samsung-Acclaim-r-shows-off-its-Android-interface-and-QWERTY-keyboard_-tena_0.jpg'><img src='http://www.askgsm.com/images/Samsung-Acclaim-r-shows-off-its-Android-interface-and-QWERTY-keyboard_-tena_0.jpg'  alt='Samsung Acclaim r880 shows off its Android interface and QWERTY keyboard' style='float:right;padding:20px;max-width:px;max-height:590px;' border title="Samsung Acclaim r shows off its Android interface and QWERTY keyboard  tena 0" /></a></p>
<p> Mobile USA (which also launched the HTC Desire later this year) said earlier that the acclamation of Samsung will be available from July. The price of the phone is not known at this time. </p>
<p> Via Engadget<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts:</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.askgsm.com/android/Samsung-Acclaim-r880-shows-off-its-Android-interface-and-QWERTY-keyboard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple on iPhone 4 reception. It&#8217;s better then fine. We only had a bad bar calculation formula…</title>
		<link>http://www.askgsm.com/apple/Apple-on-iPhone-4-reception-It-s-better-then-fine-We-only-had-a-bad-bar-calculation-formula…/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askgsm.com/apple/Apple-on-iPhone-4-reception-It-s-better-then-fine-We-only-had-a-bad-bar-calculation-formula…/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calculation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formula…]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[had]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reception.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgsm.com/?p=11158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reception issues on iPhone 4, and advice on how “to carry it the correct way”, has become the joke of the week around internet. Almost every competitor with  a grudge against iPhone needed to chime in with their very own version of “you can hold our device anyway you like and it still works” quip. Looks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reception issues on iPhone 4, and advice on how “to carry it the correct  way”, has become the joke of the week around internet.</p>
<p>Almost every competitor with  a grudge against iPhone needed to chime in with  their very own version of “you can hold our device anyway you like and it still  works” quip.</p>
<p>Looks like Apple is feeling the warmth, and now they decided to deal with  issue  head on. Their conclusions?</p>
<p>Reception on iPhone 4 is only fine. Every phone gets weaker reception, when  you hold it the certain way <a href='http://www.askgsm.com/images/Apple-on-iPhone-reception-Its-better-then-fine-We-only-had-a-bad-bar-calculation-formula_nfeoo_0.gif'><img src='http://www.askgsm.com/images/Apple-on-iPhone-reception-Its-better-then-fine-We-only-had-a-bad-bar-calculation-formula_nfeoo_0.gif'  alt='Apple on iPhone 4 reception. Its better then fine. We only had a bad bar calculation formula…' style='float:right;padding:20px;max-width:px;max-height:590px;' border title="Apple on iPhone reception Its better then fine We only had a bad bar calculation formula nfeoo 0" /></a>   But we had a wrong formula to calculate the  variety of bars indicating signal strengths. we actually used this faulty formula  for the last 2 years, in iPhone 3G and threeGs too. we are engaged on a brand new formula  for a better firmware update. As soon because it&#8217;s out, the issues will depart and  you&#8217;ll have the ability to hold your iPhone anyway you want… If there&#8217;s enough signal,  that is…</p>
<p style=" text-align: center;" ><a target="_blank"  href=" http://www.unwiredview.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/iPhone-4-signal-bars.jpg"  ><a href='http://www.askgsm.com/images/Apple-on-iPhone-reception-Its-better-then-fine-We-only-had-a-bad-bar-calculation-formula_nfeoo_1.jpg'><img src='http://www.askgsm.com/images/Apple-on-iPhone-reception-Its-better-then-fine-We-only-had-a-bad-bar-calculation-formula_nfeoo_1.jpg'  alt='Apple on iPhone 4 reception. Its better then fine. We only had a bad bar calculation formula…' style='float:right;padding:20px;max-width:px;max-height:590px;' border title="Apple on iPhone reception Its better then fine We only had a bad bar calculation formula nfeoo 1" /></a></a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the relevant a part of the clicking release:</p>
<p>Upon investigation, we were stunned in finding that the formula we use to  calculate what number of bars of signal strength to display is completely wrong. Our  formula, in lots of instances, mistakenly displays 2 more bars than it&#8217;s going to for a  given signal strength. as an example, we sometimes display 4 bars once we should  be displaying as few as 2 bars. Users observing a drop of several bars once they  grip their iPhone in a definite way are obviously in a neighborhood with very weak  signal strength, however they don&#8217;t understand it because we&#8217;re erroneously displaying 4  or 5 bars. Their big drop in bars is because their high bars were never real in  the 1st place.</p>
<p>To fix this, we&#8217;re adopting AT&#038;T&#8217;s recently recommended formula for  calculating what number of bars to display for a given signal strength. the genuine  signal strength remains a similar, but the iPhone&#8217;s bars will report it much more  accurately, providing users a miles better indication of the reception they&#8217;re going to  get in a given area. we are also making bars 1, 2 and 3 a piece taller so that they   shall be easier to work out.</p>
<p>It actually correlates quite well with the detailed analysis of iPhone 4  reception issues the <a target="_blank"  href=" http://www.anandtech.com/show/3794/the-iphone-4-review/2"  target=" _blank"  >AnandTech did</a>.</p>
<p>But it still doesn&#8217;t address the the issue of the shortcoming of insulating  coating on external antenna, that is the first cause of the difficulty, and  why bumper cases fix the problem at the moment.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Apple at least quietly adds a thin insulator layer within the   next iPhone 4 production runs.<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts:</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.askgsm.com/apple/Apple-on-iPhone-4-reception-It-s-better-then-fine-We-only-had-a-bad-bar-calculation-formula…/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile Samsung Gravity 3 (T479) appears in official photos</title>
		<link>http://www.askgsm.com/samsung/T-Mobile-Samsung-Gravity-3-T479-appears-in-official-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askgsm.com/samsung/T-Mobile-Samsung-Gravity-3-T479-appears-in-official-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gravity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone browsing from PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T479appears]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgsm.com?p=11013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Samsung T479 Gravity 3, which will be launched by T-Mobile USA on 23 June (at the same time with gravity and T Smile Samsung), has made another appearance, this time at an official-looking photos. Samsung Gravity 3 is an entry-level slider with an alphanumeric keyboard and a full QWERTY keyboard. It is obviously aimed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The Samsung T479 Gravity 3, which will be launched by T-Mobile USA on 23 June (at the same time with gravity and T Smile Samsung), has made another appearance, this time at an official-looking photos. </p>
<p> Samsung Gravity 3 is an entry-level slider with an alphanumeric keyboard and a full QWERTY keyboard. It is obviously aimed at teenagers and that many users of text, with a QVGA screen, 3G, integration of social networks, email, full HTML browser, Bluetooth 2.1 and 2MP camera. </p>
<p> Severity 3 will have two color versions (running and Indian), replacing the Samsung Gravity 2, currently offered by T-Mobile for $ 49.99 on contract. </p>
<p style=" text-align: center;" ><a href='http://www.askgsm.com/images/TMobile-Samsung-Gravity-T-appears-in-official-photos_osTni_0.jpg'><img src='http://www.askgsm.com/images/TMobile-Samsung-Gravity-T-appears-in-official-photos_osTni_0.jpg'  alt='T-Mobile Samsung Gravity 3 (T479) appears in official photos' style='float:right;padding:20px;max-width:px;max-height:590px;' border title="TMobile Samsung Gravity T appears in official photos osTni 0" /></a></p>
<p style=" text-align: center;" ><a href='http://www.askgsm.com/images/TMobile-Samsung-Gravity-T-appears-in-official-photos_osTni_1.jpg'><img src='http://www.askgsm.com/images/TMobile-Samsung-Gravity-T-appears-in-official-photos_osTni_1.jpg'  alt='T-Mobile Samsung Gravity 3 (T479) appears in official photos' style='float:right;padding:20px;max-width:px;max-height:590px;' border title="TMobile Samsung Gravity T appears in official photos osTni 1" /></a></p>
<p style=" text-align: center;" ><a href='http://www.askgsm.com/images/TMobile-Samsung-Gravity-T-appears-in-official-photos_osTni_2.jpg'><img src='http://www.askgsm.com/images/TMobile-Samsung-Gravity-T-appears-in-official-photos_osTni_2.jpg'  alt='T-Mobile Samsung Gravity 3 (T479) appears in official photos' style='float:right;padding:20px;max-width:px;max-height:590px;' border title="TMobile Samsung Gravity T appears in official photos osTni 2" /></a></p>
<p> Another Samsung device to be launched by T-Mobile USA soon (in July, perhaps) is the S Galaxy &#8211; the world&#39;s first Android smart phones have a touch screen AMOLED Super. </p>
<p> Through the signal from cell phone<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts:</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.askgsm.com/samsung/T-Mobile-Samsung-Gravity-3-T479-appears-in-official-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon iPhone 4 coming in January?</title>
		<link>http://www.askgsm.com/apple/Verizon-iPhone-4-coming-in-January/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askgsm.com/apple/Verizon-iPhone-4-coming-in-January/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[January?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgsm.com/?p=11148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of folk needs to be tired by now from these kinds of iPhone is coming to Verizon rumors. in spite of everything, Verizon iPhone has been rumored to happen for several years now,  and nothing ever came out of it. Sorry, can&#8217;t assist you to.  CDMA iPhone 4 on Verizon rumors, will only get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of folk needs to be tired by now from these kinds of iPhone is coming to  Verizon rumors. in spite of everything, Verizon iPhone has been rumored to happen for several  years now,  and nothing ever came out of it.</p>
<p>Sorry, can&#8217;t assist you to.  CDMA iPhone 4 on Verizon rumors, will only get more loud  and frequent within the  following couple of months.</p>
<p>And this is, because, IMHO, this time they&#8217;re true.</p>
<p style=" text-align: center;" ><a href='http://www.askgsm.com/images/Verizon-iPhone-coming-in-January_-onrr_0.jpg'><img src='http://www.askgsm.com/images/Verizon-iPhone-coming-in-January_-onrr_0.jpg'  alt='Verizon iPhone 4 coming in January?' style='float:right;padding:20px;max-width:px;max-height:590px;' border title="Verizon iPhone coming in January  onrr 0" /></a></p>
<p>I remember similar rumor fest raging about Apple&#8217;s iPad.The darn device was  mentioned and predicted for years, but never released. ranging from last  summer, and going into the autumn, the crescendo of rumors about iPad&#8217;s imminent  arrival reached  unbelievable levels. per week brought claim from someone, who  talked to someone, who knew something about Apple&#8217;s tablet device.</p>
<p>Well, I see something similar playing out now about iPhone 4 for Verizon.  With the newest Bloomerg report, citing “2 people familiar with the plans” of  iPhone 4 January launch on Verizon, adding to the noise.</p>
<p>And the  signs that AT&#038;T is loosing it&#8217;s iPhone  exclusivity this year, are pretty clear by now.</p>
<p>First, there are those extremely generous iPhone 4 upgrade subsidy  extensions, where AT&#038;T is allowing free upgrades months before current  customer  contract runs out. the one cause of AT&#038;T to try this, and lose  money within the  process, is the desire to fasten-in current iPhone customers into 2 year contracts, before they choose to go in different places.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the actual fact that, by now, almost everyone who desired to get  iPhone  on AT&#038;T, already got one. to restore the U.S iPhone growth, Apple now  must look to other carriers.</p>
<p>The first sign of that was Apple&#8217;s Q2 financial results, that showed a transparent slowdown in  iPhone U.S. sales growth, Now, after a mega successful iPhone 4 launch, we get analyst  estimates, that 77% of iPhone 4s went to upgrades, which confirms that future iPhone growth  possibilities on AT&#038;T are extremely limited.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know when it&#8217;s happening exactly, for Holiday season, as some say.  Or next January, as Bloomberg reports now, but, IMHO, iPhone on Verizon is  imminent within next 6-yr.<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts:</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.askgsm.com/apple/Verizon-iPhone-4-coming-in-January/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T&#8217;s HTC Aria (Liberty) Android smartphone announced (video)</title>
		<link>http://www.askgsm.com/blackberry/AT-T-s-HTC-Aria-Liberty-Android-smartphone-announced-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askgsm.com/blackberry/AT-T-s-HTC-Aria-Liberty-Android-smartphone-announced-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[announced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LibertyAndroid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon Wireless system inventory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgsm.com/?p=11054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related Posts:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Related Posts:]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.askgsm.com/blackberry/AT-T-s-HTC-Aria-Liberty-Android-smartphone-announced-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone 4&#8242;s retina display better than AMOLED? Not really, says Samsung</title>
		<link>http://www.askgsm.com/iphone/iPhone-4-s-retina-display-better-than-AMOLED-Not-really-says-Samsung/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askgsm.com/iphone/iPhone-4-s-retina-display-better-than-AMOLED-Not-really-says-Samsung/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMOLEDNot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reallysays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgsm.com?p=11011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While many expected the iPhone has a 4 to AMOLED screen, obviously it does not. Instead, Apple developed its own technology (from IPS &#8211; initially developed by Hitachi) and proudly announced a new type of screen, screen called the retina. The iPhone screen is 3.5 inches retina 4 and 960 x 640 pixels (326 ppi) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> While many expected the iPhone has a 4 to AMOLED screen, obviously it does not. Instead, Apple developed its own technology (from IPS &#8211; initially developed by Hitachi) and proudly announced a new type of screen, screen called the retina. </p>
<p> The iPhone screen is 3.5 inches retina 4 and 960 x 640 pixels (326 ppi) &#8211; the highest resolution you&#39;ll get a smart phone today. </p>
<p> When Steve Jobs introduced the new screen, which he said is &quot;much better than the OLED screens.&quot; Samsung, the world&#39;s largest manufacturer of OLED screens, disagrees. A Samsung spokesman told The Korea Herald: </p>
<p> &quot;Structurally, the IPS LCD technology can not put up with AMOLED screen technology.&quot; </p>
<p> The Korean company spokesman said further that the AMOLED technology is better than the IPS when it comes to color reproduction, contrast ratio, response time and viewing angle. The spokesman forgot to mention the visibility OLED displays&#39; poor sunlight &#8211; from this point of view, the screen of Steve Jobs retina is probably better. </p>
<p> However, Samsung has recently developed Super AMOLED screens (included in the Wave Samsung and Samsung GalaxyS), which have 80% less reflection of sunlight compared with AMOLED screens &#8211; so the issue of sunlight exposure appears to be resolved. </p>
<p style=" text-align: center;" ><a href='http://www.askgsm.com/images/iPhone-s-retina-display-better-than-AMOLED-Not-really-says-Samsung_sLSpa_0.jpg'><img src='http://www.askgsm.com/images/iPhone-s-retina-display-better-than-AMOLED-Not-really-says-Samsung_sLSpa_0.jpg'  alt='iPhone 4s retina display better than AMOLED? Not really, says Samsung' style='float:right;padding:20px;max-width:px;max-height:590px;' border title="iPhone s retina display better than AMOLED Not really says Samsung sLSpa 0" /></a></p>
<p> One of the main disadvantages of the display of the retina Apple (with its super high resolution) is that &quot;increases the power consumption by 30 percent, so the final Super AMOLED screens may actually be better. But I do not know for sure until someone gets an iPhone and a Samsung Wave 4 Compare / S Galaxy and the next performance of his show.<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts:</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.askgsm.com/iphone/iPhone-4-s-retina-display-better-than-AMOLED-Not-really-says-Samsung/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#WWDC highlights: iPhone 4 now a true smartphone. Steve leapfrogs rivals by years with iOS, gets really anxious about Google</title>
		<link>http://www.askgsm.com/samsung/WWDC-highlights-iPhone-4-now-a-true-smartphone-Steve-leapfrogs-rivals-by-years-with-iOS-gets-really-anxious-about-Google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askgsm.com/samsung/WWDC-highlights-iPhone-4-now-a-true-smartphone-Steve-leapfrogs-rivals-by-years-with-iOS-gets-really-anxious-about-Google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android-on-its]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anxious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highlightsiPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iOSgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leapfrogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rivals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphoneSteve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[true]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[years]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgsm.com?p=11010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were quite a few interesting things presented at Apple, Steve Jobs, Apple WWDC Home. iPhone 4 catch our attention. And it really is a great device. Specwise, iPhone 4 came later than other high-end smartphones in every way that matters. Since the iPhone OS had the best user experience at all, and other providers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> There were quite a few interesting things presented at Apple, Steve Jobs, Apple WWDC Home. </p>
<p> iPhone 4 catch our attention. And it really is a great device. Specwise, iPhone 4 came later than other high-end smartphones in every way that matters. Since the iPhone OS had the best user experience at all, and other providers was based iPhone sorely missed features to promote their flagship, this is a very large cast. </p>
<p> But, in my humble opinion, an even more important, occurred during the WWDC opening. Hiding behind a name change iPhone iOS4 simple operating system, was the official statement from Apple that have a major new computing platform &#8211; IOS. And new computing paradigm ad based on a lightweight, power and resources efficiently, connected OS. Most of the competition was completely caught by surprise by this change again, and take at least a year to even begin to put up. </p>
<p> With the exception of Google, which emerged as the main competitor to Apple now. </p>
<p> iPhone 4 will finally become a true high-end smartphone
<p> My Take away four big announcement is that the iPhone iPhone has finally becamcomes true high-end smartphone. </p>
<p> Yes, the iPhone has been high end, very popular, always the best user experience, tons of interesting applications, and what not. But the feature / spec rational yet been put up in the standard market for smartphones. All that time to justify this or that feature is missing does not matter, to become a major, must take place in the next iPhone. </p>
<p> Remember &quot;Who needs 3G when you have WiFi?&quot;, Bluetooth, copy and paste, 2 megapixel camera is good enough, multitasking? </p>
<p> The strength of the iPhone was always far superior user experience, not specifications. But these missing features and specifications at the top of the line, high-end mobile phones, allows competitors to promote their offerings as a superior, despite its shortcomings general UX. </p>
<p> Well, no. 4 With the iPhone, the top competition in the smart phone market became considerably more difficult. iPhone 4 is now good enough for 95% of potential customers high-end smartphone. My guess is, the writers of upcoming ago &quot;Droid&quot; campaign will take a lot of rethinking to do. </p>
<p> Over the next 4-6 months, at $ 500-700price range smartphone, the iPhone is still the only viable competitor to Android. Although somewhat limited in overall usability, Android (2.1/2.2 and next version of gingerbread) have a good enough UX, tight integration with Google, and another cloud and social services. It is a much more open platform with great appeal for more technical. </p>
<p> The last wish HTC Android phones, Incredible, EVO 4G, Samsung S Galaxy, Motorola Milestone XT720 &#8211; look very attractive when compared with iPhone 3Gs. But with the iPhone, 4 the game for marketers Android was much more difficult. </p>
<p> Other providers / platforms in 2010 &#8211; Symbian Nokia, Samsung Bada, Palm WebOS, expensive feature phones &#8211; the players are not here (at the top), and is the only competition in the markets mid-tier/mass to $ 450 and lower price points. Rumor meegin Nokia device is a bit of a wildcard, but Q4 is coming up, and even if very good, take time to track the sales team, so it will probably be a point of discussion for competitive environment in 2010. </p>
<p> iPhone OS becomes IOS 4. A new computing platform connected toApple
<p> Starting this week, Apple officially started a new computing platform online. </p>
<p> Until this year, we were accustomed to thinking of the iPhone OS, such as the Apple platform for smartphones and other handhelds like the iPod Touch. When it was first launched in 2007, the iPhone OS was presented as a mini version of OSX. </p>
<p> This year, when Apple introduced IPADE &#8211; with the same iPhone-OS was revealed that some may have greater ambitions for this operating system. But we were still guessing. This week it became official. The new platform has been stripped of clothes and baby iPhone became IOS 4. </p>
<p> Kind of reminds me of another great name change to Apple. Until 2007 we used to know this company like Apple Computer Inc. In that time, key metrics for success were related to Apple computers. Yes, I had iTunes, iPod, Apple TV and what not. But ads like these all have great new Mac OSX and new features. Most of Apple&#39;s revenue also has a direct bearing on personal computers. </p>
<p> Then in 2007, dropping &quot;computer&quot; in the name of the company, Apple says clearly that not considered a teammore business. They are much more than that. </p>
<p> Fast forward to today &#8211; while next to the computer company still has a lot of Apple&#39;s revenue, provided that at least keep up with market trends, nobody cares much about . In comparison with the media frenzy a few years ago, I would say new Mac ads are greeted with a collective yawn, as are new iterations of OSX, as Snow Leopard. </p>
<p> And Monday opening of WWDC, Steve Jobs did not mention Mac OSX or even once! Along with the renaming of the IOS, the signal is very clear. Apple is still milking cash cow business of computers in the coming years, improving as the market demands. But the thing of the past. </p>
<p> Apple is the main platform of devices now &#8211; it&#39;s IOS 4. I think that is about to enter each device connected to Apple here. </p>
<p> IOS could have been disguised mini OSX version for smartphones and pocket-size devices, but is designed as a platform for greater computing from the beginning. In retrospect, one can clearly see that in many multi-touch patent application was submitted to Apple and Steve Jobs did admit DuriD8 ng interview. </p>
<p> This now looks like a costume of the most brilliant plays by Steve Jobs. When you think about it, there was no reason for Apple to make a great phone, prior to IOS in a tablet. In fact, with its functioning in a pocket-sized device, it must have been a much harder task. But diverting everyone&#39;s attention on what can be done by IOS smartphones, Apple&#39;s built a new generation online platform, with a Narya realize the competition. Most of the jumping competition for at least a year. </p>
<p> And to build the most active and vibrant ecosystem around the new platform. Apple now has 100 million of IOS devices out there (a number is a bit exaggerated, because not all IOS devices sold are still in operation). They have hundreds of thousands of developers working on software for the new platform. The IOS has already generated $ 1 billion in direct revenue for developers. Add to indirect advertising revenues, sales generated through various applications IOS, all services that arose throughout the application development IOS, and the financial printing becomes even morevoice. </p>
<p> What competition? </p>
<p> For now, Microsoft is a non-holder in this new paradigm of computing the light line. Operating system is Windows 7 is just OK for netbooks, and after IPADE desperate for pills. Your smart phone operating system WP7 &#8211; even be ready for the market for the next 5 months. Its lightweight compact integrated compressed Windows 7 seems right in concept stage and not ready for at least a year. </p>
<p> Nokia / Intel&#39;s meegin could become a good computing platform connected to a light day. And we may see the first Nokia devices meegin this year, but this is new, just a smart phone. Meegin not be ready for a major factor devices until sometime in 2011. </p>
<p> WebOS? Now that HP bought, can have something interesting to show time. But do not come back until later next year. </p>
<p> Apple is pissed off / upset over Google
<p> Having a one year, or greater advantage, before its main competitors can even start thinking about putting up, is something hardly seen in the technology industry. And, with its iPhone OS brilliant bad address, Steve Jobs, got it. </p>
<p> With the exception of one,unlikely competitor &#8211; Google. I do not know why Google decided to enter the platform of their own business. Maybe something is learned, Eric Schmidt, was on board when Apple. Or maybe it was just a natural evolution of the company, after becoming the fabric of the Internet. But as unlikely as it might have seemed a few years ago, Google&#39;s main competitor Apple. </p>
<p> They are also gaining ground on Apple, Steve Jobs, and doing so quite nervous and pissed off. </p>
<p> Just look at the knee Apple automatic reactions to each statement that Android is becoming bigger than the iPhone. A series of pot shots taken by Steve at Google in his speech WWDC. Ban from the Google network AdMob IOS applications, with blatant anti-competitive act, even at the risk of inviting federal control of their practices &#8230; </p>
<p> This shows that Apple feels very uneasy by Google. I have reason to feel that way. If only because of the speed of light main Google OS is evolving. </p>
<p> Last year, when the iPhone OS iPhone 3Gs 3 and up, Android was 1.5. A really crude, immature, not ready for a greater incorporation of the operating system. But when tOok create iOS4 Apple, Google went for Android 1.6, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, and now offers a powerful and easy to use smartphone OS. In the next 3-6 months to transform this system was operating on a platform full of fact and law lightweight computer that works well on tables for netbooks, televisions and other things. </p>
<p> Apple still has at least six months instead of Google, but this is far less of a break then Apple would have had if Google had been glued to it&#39;s traditional business. </p>
<p> Anyway, I&#39;m looking for a Google vs Apple showdown pretty interesting this fall. And next year, when other competitors had time to process what just happened, and react to it, the fireworks are just bigger.<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts:</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.askgsm.com/samsung/WWDC-highlights-iPhone-4-now-a-true-smartphone-Steve-leapfrogs-rivals-by-years-with-iOS-gets-really-anxious-about-Google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Galaxy S Vibrant coming to Bell Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.askgsm.com/apple/Samsung-Galaxy-S-Vibrant-coming-to-Bell-Canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askgsm.com/apple/Samsung-Galaxy-S-Vibrant-coming-to-Bell-Canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vibrant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgsm.com/?p=11147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T-Mobile USA isn&#8217;t the one North American carrier to launch the Galaxy S as Samsung Vibrant: Bell shall be spreading the vibrant Android fun, too &#8211; but in Canada, obviously. It feels like Bell is the exclusive Canadian carrier for the Galaxy S Vibrant. However, this doesn&#8217;t mean Rogers or Telus won&#8217;t have the ability [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-Mobile USA isn&#8217;t the one North American carrier to launch the Galaxy S as Samsung Vibrant: Bell shall be spreading the vibrant Android fun, too &#8211; but in Canada, obviously.</p>
<p>It feels like Bell is the exclusive Canadian carrier for the Galaxy S Vibrant. However, this doesn&#8217;t mean Rogers or Telus won&#8217;t have the ability to release the smartphone &#8211; they&#8217;re able to just give it another name, like Verizon did within the  US.</p>
<p>Bell presents the Samsung Galaxy S Vibrant as having the area&#8217;s best mobile screen (4 inches, WVGA Super AMOLED). Sure enough, Apple may beg to vary.</p>
<p>The Vibrant will probably run Android 2.1 at launch. But don&#8217;t worry, a Froyo update shall be released sometime later this year.</p>
<p style=" text-align: center;" ><a href='http://www.askgsm.com/images/Samsung-Galaxy-S-Vibrant-coming-to-Bell-Canada_nyuen_0.jpg'><img src='http://www.askgsm.com/images/Samsung-Galaxy-S-Vibrant-coming-to-Bell-Canada_nyuen_0.jpg'  alt='Samsung Galaxy S Vibrant coming to Bell Canada' style='float:right;padding:20px;max-width:px;max-height:590px;' border title="Samsung Galaxy S Vibrant coming to Bell Canada nyuen 0" /></a></p>
<p>Bell doesn&#8217;t say when exactly its Samsung Galaxy S Vibrant shall be available. The handset&#8217;s price also is not known, but Canadian customers should expect to pay not more than $200 for it on contract. which you can check in here to receive more details from Bell.</p>
<p>Via BGR<br />
<h3 class='related_post_title'>Related Posts:</h3>
<ul class='related_post'>
<li></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.askgsm.com/apple/Samsung-Galaxy-S-Vibrant-coming-to-Bell-Canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTC Verizon Droid Incredible Review. Video</title>
		<link>http://www.askgsm.com/blackberry/HTC-Verizon-Droid-Incredible-Review-Video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askgsm.com/blackberry/HTC-Verizon-Droid-Incredible-Review-Video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BlackBerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dragon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReviewVideo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askgsm.com/?p=11053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Related Posts:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Related Posts:]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.askgsm.com/blackberry/HTC-Verizon-Droid-Incredible-Review-Video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.askgsm.com @ 2010-09-03 01:24:32 -->